9/24/07

Openers, Limiters and Pairs of Opposites

One of the things that seems to help my playing the most is teaching advanced students. I am challenged to analyze and describe my personal concepts and approaches to Jazz improvisation. Yesterday as I was teaching a lesson I realized that I like to start out my solos with an abstract theme. I look for something that has an interesting shape to start my solos with. It may not even be such a strange shape or rhythm, or it may just be a pattern that lays funny on the horn. I do this in hopes that I'll stimulate something new in response to it. It doesn't need to be complete idea, just an introduction for what will follow.

For me, the first statement is very important developing the rest of the solo. I want to feel like I'm circling the tune like a vulture, waiting for the right time to drop in and devour my carcass. The first statements of a solo should have some relationship with either the tune or the prior solo. It should let the listener know that a new section of music has started. These first statements also act as a bridge for what came before. It's a mood change. I may not even have a particular mood in mind, it may be just an expression or a type of look that you may give someone.

Sometimes just for a change of pace I'll give myself 'limiters'. This means that I'll pick a few specific limits to different factors of my playing. I might set a limit on the range of just the first chorus, for example only playing between low D and middle G. Another approach would be to limit the dynamics that are you use, an example would be to play only piano on the A sections and only forte on the bridges. You might limit yourself to a couple of types of articulation or one type of interval. You could also limit yourself directionally, like only playing lines that ascend. If you combine more than one 'limiter' you can really get some cool effects that you might not come across any other way.

By using limits in this way you can create some very interesting and unique textural effects. You don't have to use limits for your entire solo, maybe just in the beginning or for a short period of time in the middle or at the end. You might try switching from a set of limiters to the opposite (or complementary) set of limiters half way though the solo. Some limiters would be better used for free playing, they can give structure and variety when there is little form in the music. An example of a limiter best used in free situations would be to only play flat or sharp, or to only play alternate fingerings.

Like any technique or musical device it takes some practice to get from the conscious mentation stage to the intuitive reaction stage. At first limiters are an entirely intellectual process, but with some practice they become automatic and natural. Of course some limiters will probably never be totally spontaneous, like deciding to only play Major or Diminished triads over an entire tune. Sometimes you need to set limits in order to focus what you're working on.

The idea of limiters is also related to what I like to think of as the table of opposites. This is an adaptation from an an idea from an ancient document called the tablet of Hermes. The fourth principle from this document is the principle of polarity. It reads like this:
  • “Everything is Dual; everything has poles; everything has its pair of opposites; like and unlike are the same; opposites are identical in nature, but different in degree; extremes meet; all truths are but half-truths; all paradoxes may be reconciled.”


    This Principle embodies the truth that “everything is dual”; “everything has two poles”; “everything has its pair of opposites”; these phrases are old Hermetic axioms. It explains the old paradoxes that have perplexed so many, and which have been stated as follows: “Thesis and antithesis are identical in nature, but different in degree”; “opposites are the same, differing only in degree”; “the pairs of opposites may be reconciled”; “extremes meet”; “everything is, and isn’t, at the same time”; “all truths are but half-truths”; “every truth is half-false”; “there are two sides to everything”, etc.

    The Principle of Polarity explains that, in everything, there are two poles, or opposite aspects, and that “opposites” are really only the two extremes of the same thing, with many varying degrees between them. For example: heat and cold, although “opposites” are really the same thing; the differences consisting merely of degrees of the same thing. Look at your thermometer and see if you can discover where “hot” ends and “cold” begins! There is no such thing as “absolute heat” or “absolute cold”; The two terms “heat” and “cold” simply indicate varying degrees of the same thing, and that “same thing” which manifests as “heat” and “cold” is merely a form, variety, and rate of Vibration. So “hot” and “cold” are simply the two poles of that which we call “Heat”, and the phenomena attendant thereupon are the manifestations of the Principle of Polarity. The same Principle manifests in the case of “Light” and “Darkness,” which are the same thing, the difference consisting of varying degrees between the two poles of the phenomena. Where does “darkness” leave off, and “light” begin? What is the difference between “Large and Small”? Between “Hard and Soft”? Between “Black and White”? Between “Sharp and Dull”? Between “Noise and Quiet”? Between “High and Low”? Between “Positive and Negative”?

    The Principle of Polarity explains these paradoxes and no other Principle can supersede it. The same Principle operates on the Mental Plane. Let us take a radical and extreme example – that of “Love and Hate,” two mental states apparently totally different. And yet there are degrees of Hate and degrees of Love; and a middle point in which we use the terms “Like” or “Dislike,” which shade into each other so gradually that sometimes we are at a loss to know whether we “like” or “dislike” or “neither”. These opposing sentiments are simply different degrees of the same thing.

Can musical principles also be seen in this way?

How about these for a start:

Horizontal-Vertical
Sharp-Flat
Fast-Slow
Ascending-Descending
Bright-Dark
Short-Long
Dense-Sparse
Consonant-Dissonant
Legato-Stacatto
ppp-fff
Rushing-Dragging
Inside-Outside
Tradition-Modern
Sensitive-Aggressive
Sad-Happy
Vibrato-Dry
High-Low
Sloppy-Clean
Straight-Swinging
and on and on.....

The more you become aware of all of the opposites, the more you can determine where your playing is on the scale of the opposites and the more you can bring balance and variety to your playing. Some players may be totally unaware of let's say the Sad-Happy opposite and always play happy sounding solos, never varying the level of happiness. Some of the West Coast swing players might do this. By consciously playing toward the opposite poles of your usual playing you can break yourself out of some real ruts.

Awareness of the musical opposites can really help give you a better idea of all your musical options for improvisation. If you aren't aware of these opposites then you could end up getting stuck in a rut with regards to your overall sound and texture. Even the mental and emotional sets of opposites can help you give more variety and depth to your improvisation.

And the Infinite,
according to Its Wisdom,
took a portion of its own being
and separated itself
into the pairs of opposites
which make up all aspects
of the manifest;
Dark and Light;
Night and Day;
Cold and Hot;
Wet and Dry;
Soft and Hard;
Negative and Positive;
Female and Male;
Dead and Living.
We must develop our abstract thinking in order to fully understand such an abstract art form like music.

Astrology and pairs of opposites

9/22/07

TV Links- better than a remote control

I usually try to keep this blog on topic, sometimes I even do. One of the themes on Casa Valdez is digital entertainment and I just discovered the motherload. My buddy just sent me a link to a British site that has links to just about every TV show, movie, cartoon, documentary, music video and anime that you can think of. I was in shock when I saw it. No more trolling Limewire for days just to find that last episode of Six Feet Under or the Six Million Dollar Man. Everything is here and in high and low quality streaming video, and it's F- R- E- E. Toss out your TV and cancel your cable TV service, now all you need is a fast connection and a big computer monitor. How do they possibly get away with this shit?!

Can you say," Yaaaarrr, ye scallywagger!"

Well, here's what their legal page has to say:

  • TV Links is not responsible for any content linked to or referred to from these pages.

    TV Links does not host any content on our Servers

    All video links point to content hosted on third party webites. Users who upload to these websites agree not to upload illegal content when creating their user accounts. TV Links does not accept responsibility for content hosted on third party websites.


The categories are Shows, Documentaries, Cartoons, Anime, Movies and Music Videos. There are plenty of new movies here also. I haven't watched many so I don't know if they are of the handy cam in the trench coat variety or not.

and you thought that YouTube was wasting too much of your time.

UPDATE: TV Links did finally get busted and pulled off the Net. Here's another similar site that is almost as good- alluc.org


9/14/07

George Garzone- less on the fringe

George Garzone now has a long overdue website at www.georgegarzone.com. It looks to me like the web design of Kenny Brooks, one of his favorite students and lately a musical collaborator. When I saw George in Boston last weekend I asked him about the three tenor gig he played a couple of days prior with Kenny Brooks and Douglas Yates. He told me," Man, those guys are playing on a totally new level. That's going to be the first CD I produce myself." Shit, I wish I had seen that show.

George's site has a great page called 'Words of Wisdom', which has memorable Garzone quotes contributed by students and friends. If you have any memorable quotes from the master send them to- saxgarzone@aol.com

Here are a few of the Garzonisms-

"You have to find the center of time." contributed by
Rick Stone

"Don't use your tongue...stop that tonguing..." - contributed by Rick Stone

"Otto, you're playing on those 2 by 4's, aren't you?"- contributed by Matt Otto

"In the early 1980's the Fringe performed a live radio broadcast and George was interviewed after the performance. The interviewer asked George how the Fringe played the way they did. George replied, "We listened to the messages." The interviewer asked where the messages come from, and George replied, "...from God".
- contributed by Wayne de Silva


The Fringe in New York
One Two Three Four
Four's and Two's
Moodiology

9/11/07

Herb Pomeroy- In his own words


This half-hour radio show produced by WGBH features Herb Pomeroy talking about his life and music. Herb talks about his experience playing with Bird, his days at the Stable, his feelings about big bands, the music of Duke Ellington, his teaching career, and his philosophy of life.

WGBH Jazz portrait of Herb Pomeroy in his own words and music

Walking on Air
This Is Always
Star Dust & Beyond: A Tribute to Artie Shaw

9/7/07

Sonny Rollins Turns 77- rare unseen footage!


Revamped Web Site Celebrates With Rare Music & Video

Sonny Rollins turns 77 today -- September 7, 2007 -- and on the eve of the saxophonist's 50th Anniversary Concert at Carnegie Hall, his newly revamped web site debuts, celebrating an extraordinary life in jazz.

Beginning today, and every day leading up to the Carnegie Hall concert on September 18, the site will be broadcasting rare performances, including a 1956 gig with the Max Roach/Clifford Brown All-Stars. Specifically, two different tracks from an unreleased June 2, 1956 engagement at Cleveland's Cotton Club by the Max Roach/Clifford Brown group, featuring a 25-year-old Sonny Rollins, will be broadcast on the site each day from now until September 18. The birthday celebration also includes a 1968 video of Sonny playing in quartet with Kenny Drew, Niels-Henning Orsted Pedersen, and Albert "Tootie" Heath.

Since it premiered two years ago, on Sonny's 75 th birthday, http://sonnyrollins.com/ has attracted more than 750,000 visitors. The Sonny Rollins Podcast and additional video produced for Sonny by Bret Primack -- which appear on the site and YouTube and are available for download on iTunes -- have also found a sizable audience with over 300,000 views and downloads.

Primack has given the site an attractive facelift and added dynamic new content, including a multimedia biography; an enhanced shop that features all of Sonny's recordings currently in print, as well as lead sheets, transcriptions, arrangements, and books; and an expanded forum area that provides Sonny's global audience with a vehicle to interact and discuss the man and his music. "With all this video and interactivity, and by linking the site with YouTube and iTunes, as well as selling his own downloads, Sonny Rollins is uniquely positioned as an artist totally in tune with today's technology," Primack explains. "Sonny's utilization of this medium serves as the model for all musicians in the new millennium."

The Bridge
Sound of Sonny
Sonny Rollins: Jazz Play-Along Series Volume 33 (Jazz Play Along Series)
The Sonny Rollins Collection: Saxophone
Jazz Style of Sonny Rollins (Giants of Jazz)

9/6/07

Point of Departure- award winning Jazz website


Point of Departure was the Jazz Journalists Association Jazz Award Nominee for Best Website Concentrating on Jazz for 2006 and 2007. This site has class, which is quite rare in the online Jazz world. There are great articles, photo essays, round table discussions, and CD reviews in this online Jazz journal published by Bill Shoemaker. The design is clean and the writing is intelligent. You won't find any articles about Dave Koz or Boney James here since the emphasis is on Free Jazz and the Avant-Garde. Actually, I think that anyone who is interested in Jazz as high-art rather than just cocktail enhancement will find Point of Departure interesting.

9/2/07

The Tranumentary- all about Trane

Being a Trane fanatic of the first order,
I was shocked when I saw this amazing page about Coltrane (thanks to Tim Price). Tranumentary is a series of audio interviews with some serious musicians, all talking about Trane or commmenting on different Coltrane recordings. As of the time of this article there are 32 different episodes:

As if this incredible series weren't enough you can even listen to episodes via mobile phone!
What is this world coming to?

TRANUMENTARY

JOHNCOLTRANE.COM

John Coltrane Solos
Vol. 13 - John Coltrane: Jazz Play-Along Series (Jazz Play Along Series)
John Coltrane: Improvised Saxophone Solos
The Music of John Coltrane (Jazz Giants)
John Coltrane Plays Giant Steps
Coltrane Plays Standards (Artist Transcriptions)
Mel Bay Essential Jazz Lines in the Style of John Coltrane (Guitar Edition)
John Coltrane Plays "Coltrane Changes": C Instruments

8/27/07

Charles McPherson on YouTube




Charles has THE SOUND, period.


Kenny Barron Trio w. Charles mcpherson - Star Eyes
Charles mcpherson Quartet - Tenor Madness - Club Date
Charles mcpherson Quartet - Crazeology aka Bud's Bubble
Charles mcpherson Quartet - Body And Soul - Club Date
Charles mcpherson Quartet - Club Date w/Randy Porter







Come Play With Me
Manhattan Nocturne
Be-Bop Revisited
Charles McPherson With Strings "A Tribute to Charlie Parker"
Live at the Cellar

The World of Max Roach pt.II- by Bill Mithoefer


In 1960, Roach would record what would become his magnum opus, an unprecedented attempt to fuse his African-American social concerns with a spoken word/instrumental jazz suite, “Freedom Now Suite – We Insist!” The recording included Coleman Hawkins, arguably one of the inventors of the tenor saxophone solo, trombonist Julian Priester and trumpeter Booker Little, brass players who, like Sonny Rollins, approached free jazz with a firm foundation in bebop, the Nigerian percussionist, Michael Olatunji (later Babatunde Olatunji,) and the singer Abbey Lincoln (incidentally, his wife.) This 7-part collaboration with Oscar Brown, Jr. prefigured later works by Archie Shepp, John Coltrane, Julius Hemphill, Charles Mingus and even the Bill Jones/Arnie Zane dance ensemble. Although not particularly commercially successful, Roach laid his career on the line in an ambitious attempt to directly infuse his musical innovations with a social conscience.

Roach’s friend and associate Charles Mingus had already laid to vinyl tunes such as “Fables of Faubus,” “Put Me In That Dungeon,” and “Prayer For Passive Resistance,” direct social commentaries on the African-American desire for emancipation. Roach’s longer work was probably the first attempt at producing a longer work dealing with these issues.

Roach was evolving musically as well, while continuing to record more straight ahead albums with musicians such as Tommy and Stanley Turrentine, he was now providing the rhythmic accompaniment for the extemporaneous adventures of Booker Little and Eric Dolphy. With an acerbic tone and exuberantly audacious technique on Alto Saxophone, Flute, and Bass Clarinet, Dolphy helped catalyze Mingus’ further development of his “street music” and would become involved in some of John Coltrane’s early sixties concerts as well as his ambitious longer written work, Africa/Brass. His playing can immediately provoke arguments amongst horn players who might agree on most other aspects of taste, but, like Trane, he would organize his solos with rhythmically complex compound figures which must have been quite stimulating for a drummer of the calibre of Max Roach.

As the ‘60’s progressed, Roach would record with Afro-centric pianist Randy Weston and incorporate Mal Waldron into his own ensembles. He was still recording with Duke Ellington and would make a fantastic record with Charles Mingus and the pianist entitled “Money Jungle.” Naturally focussed on Ellington’s works, this record is unique in sound. Mingus had extensively studied Ellington’s music and there was no better drummer to contribute to it’s minimalistic impressionism than Roach. The band sounds as if they were simply running through the compositions, with sublime performances on such notable tunes as “African Flower,” “Warm Valley,” and “Solitude.” Their superhuman communication sounds fresh and modern even today.

In the late ‘60’s, while Roach continued to tour with earlier associates such as Sonny Rollins and Howard McGhee, he would continue to expand the horizons in his bands, featuring horn players such as trumpeters Freddie Hubbard and Charles Tolliver, and saxophonists Steve Lacy and Odean Pope. With open mind and open ears, Roach continued to innovate behind the drum kit. Like Miles Davis, Roach would continue to mirror both society at large and stay in the vanguard of historical developments in the jazz world. Their difference, it might be argued, is that Roach paid less attention to fashion, commercialism and celebrity, preferring to continue an unpretentious no-nonsense approach to innovating both in the music called jazz and as a technician on the drums.

By the early ‘70’s, electric instrumentation, along with rock and funk, had become deeply entrenched in the mainstream entertainment industry. While many musicians embraced the development of fusion, an attempt to form a hybridized music featuring rhythmic elements from all three genres with the focus on improvisation defining jazz, quite a few including Roach, who had incorporated innovations from free jazz would maintain a staunch acoustic purity in their music. His curiosity, however, would not rest as he continued to experiment with unusual instrumentation, founding the innovative percussion ensemble, M’Boom.


Some of the musicians who would embrace the electric instrumentation of fusion, would capitalize quite successfully on these developments, with lucrative major label recording contracts. But Roach and other purists would become early founders of Jazz education in the american university system. He worked tirelessly to continue promoting jazz as a forum for African-American dignity and social consciousness and continued to experiment musically, yet ignoring the consequences, from an economic standpoint. He would continue to record the odd bebop record, while also playing with Archie Shepp, Cecil Taylor and Anthony Braxton.

The eighties would bring Max Roach’s double quartet to fruition. Tireless in his creativity, he would make records with string quartets, even a symphony orchestra. He would become a Macarthur fellow in 1988, recognized for his individual talent and pursuit of creativity in the arts. Until 2002, he continued to tour the world presenting his solo drum performances and iconoclastic bands.

I was lucky enough to witness a performance in Oakland in the early ‘90’s. For what must have been an hour, Roach took his drum kit through the paces, schooling the audience on his rhythmic conception that had taken us through bebop, hard bop, and free jazz. After what must have been a full hour, his band, Odean Pope, Cecil Bridgewater and Tyrone Brown fired the energy up to a higher level. The music had more in common with Cecil Taylor than Charlie Parker, and I would leave that night both thoroughly satisfied and completely drained.

After writing this article, I realized that Max Roach was far more central to the history of Jazz than I might have imagined. He probably paid a price for his refusal to kowtow to the forces of commercialism and his outspoken views on race and social issues. After all is said and done, he could never be accused of either resting on his laurels or “selling out.”

A quick note on the pitfalls I may have fallen into writing this piece. 1) I understand that jazz is predominantly live music, but recordings are the documents one must refer to in writing about music. 2) Even the term “jazz” itself is problematic as a brief look at Bird’s blindfold test for Downbeat will point out. It’s all music, and as he says, one can get in the right frame of mind to listen to just about anything. 3) A 4 page two-part article is almost by definition reductionistic, but I hope that I’ve at least distilled some of the essence of what Max Roach accomplished over a long and inspiring life.

Cheers, Bill Mithoefer, Portland, OR 2007

8/21/07

Do you really need to memorize Jazz licks?

Maurizio Miotti, a regular reader from Rome, wrote in with a great question.

He says,
  • " My saxophone teacher tells me that I can study music theory and harmony, but if I want to improvise jazz music I have to listen, memorize and play “jazz phrases”. The same situation with learn a new language: you can study grammar but when you talk with someone, you have to use idiomatic expressions because grammar is a set of theoretical roles (sometimes “a little distant” from the current language) and pre-defined phrases are more efficient for communication."
This a very good analogy. Jazz is a universal language that is spoken all over the world. I can go to Poland and call All the Things on the stand and immediately be speaking the same language as the band musically. Licks are very much like idiomatic expressions, they are the elements of a musical language that can be understood the world over. Many licks are favorite patterns developed by an influential player. These are often forever tied to this player as signature licks. Everybody knows exactly who these licks came from as soon as you play them. Yes, Bird and Trane live, because everyone is still playing their shit!

Other licks a
re what I call 'Public Domain' licks. These are pattern and lines that can't really be tracked down to any particular player. These are the first licks that young players memorize as they learn to improvise. Most diminished and whole tone patterns are in this class. These licks are your garden variety stale old Be-bop licks. David Baker has done a wonderful job cataloging these public domain licks in his 'How to Play Bebop' books. These are licks are tried and true, good as gold and oldies but goodies. Everyone has heard these expressions, but they still carry a strong meaning are are understood by everyone who speaks the language. By learning public domain licks you learn how to construct logical and meaningful lines, they can also act as fillers when you aren't feeling totally spontaneous.

If you were to speak using nothing but idiomatic expressions you'd sound ridiculous.

It would be like an albatross round your neck if you thought it was all the rage to jump on the bandwagon with the rank and file who play nothing but licks, thinking they were real deal and the creme de la creme. In all honesty these dime a dozen bean counters make me lose my lunch!

Get my drift?

Like idioms, licks are meaningful elements of a musical language, but they can and usually are overused. I once heard Donny McCaslin say that you need to learn all the common licks so that you don't ever have to play them. Many professional players never get past the point of playing nothing but licks, we would call these guys totally derivative or BOOOOOORING. True, some great licks never get old, no matter how many time you hear them, but some dumb licks can make a great player sound corny and hokey in an instant.

It also d
epends on location. You might get away with playing an old Bebop line in Idaho that would evoke groans from an audience in the East Village. The less the listener knows about Jazz, the better these corny-ass lines sound, because they haven't heard every beginning soloist play them already. You can fool an uneducated audience into thinking that you're can really play by stringing a bunch of stale licks together, it's a fast way to sound like you're playing Real Jazz. Is this really creative? Some would argue that it is and that the goal is to sound good, and playing lots of licks helps you sound good. Many, many players take this way of playing to the extreme and play nothing but licks that they have memorized. They are happy to regurgitate dumb licks for their entire career.

There are different approaches that teachers take with students with regards to learning licks.
The fir
st approach is to have the student memorize a ton of licks in every key. The great disadvantage to this approach is that the student ends up sounding redundant by repeating the exact same lick in many different keys during a solo. Also if the student never breaks free of this mode of learning they end up sounding totally generic. There is also no cohesion in the player's solos, just a bunch of unrelated parts.

  • "That guy sounds like every other tenor player, but no one in particular"
I have my students work out of books like David Baker's How to Play Bebop in order to get them hearing how lines are constructed and also to give them ideas about how to construct their own lines. To me licks are like training wheels that you eventually take off once you've learned how to improvise your own original lines. Even great players sometimes break out an old Bebop lick once and a while, maybe as a nod to a favorite player or for some kind of effect. Sure, I use elements of the many different licks that I've memorized over the years, but only small parts of these licks. Now I use licks as templates from which to build my own lines. I do sound like a Bebop player when I play Bebop because I've incorporated the vernacular of Bebop into my playing over the years. You can hear Bird, Cannonball and many other players in there, but you'd probably be hard pressed to pick out exactly which line came from which player. When I was younger you probably could pick out many Bird phrases in my solos, but as I get older I've created more of my own personal vernacular. The biggest reason players like Pops, Bird, Trane and Woody Shaw were innovators was that they created their own personal language that was so compelling that it influenced players for years to come. Their personal idioms became the public domain licks that everyone else incorporated into their own playing.

How is the evolution of the language of Jazz much like the evolution of language? Once in a while a particularly strong personality comes along, say like a Snoop Dog, and suddenly everyone is putting 'izzle' on the the end of words. Sometimes these fo'shizzles and mo'nizzles pass like fads, other times they work their way into the language and end up in Webster's dictionary or maybe even spoken on the lips of the queen of England.

Yusef Lateef used to tell his students that it is never too early to start developing an original sound and style. The idea that you must first learn all the idiomatic Jazz licks before you can really start creating an original style is total BULLSHIT.

You can be working on your own unique way of playing from the very beginning by learning to make everything you absorb your own. Yes, practice the public domain licks and patterns, but as you learn them put your own twist on them. Displace a note here and there, change a rhythm, leave a note out, add an accidental, just do something to it. Take different pieces of patterns and combine them in unusual ways. I have my students look at David Baker's ii-V7 licks (the ones that are all in the same key and stacked one above the other) and play the ii-7 bar from one lick and a V7 bar from another lick. I have them try all different V7 resolutions with the same ii-7 bar. Then I might have them play the same ii-7 bar and play an improvised V7 using a diminished scale, then a whole-tone, then an altered dominant, ect. Then I have them play different ii-7 bars while keeping the same V7 resolution the same.

You don't have to wait until you've mastered the Jazz language to start creating your own personal idioms. On the other hand if you create a personal language that has no relationship at all to the languages that everyone else is speaks then no one will be able to converse with or understand you. Remember Steve Martin's routine when he talks about wanting to have a kid and teach him to speak random gibberish for laughs?

It all comes down to balance. A good balance between original and idiomatic material is essential in order to sound fresh and still sound like you're grounded in the Jazz tradition. You don't want to alienate the other musicians or your audience by playing the music of the spheres all night. You also don't want to sound like the you sleep with the Omnibook under your pillow
(which I thoroughly approve of by the way) or that the only record you own is Heavy Metal Bebop.

Why bother even pulling out your horn if you're just going to play licks that you memorized from records and books? Respect the tradition by adapting it's idioms and making them your own own, not by being stuck playing nothing but music from before 1957. Take a chance and be creative, even at the expense of sounding sloppy and bad once in a while. Try not to use long licks, instead only use short fragments.

Innovate as you emulate. It's possible to sound very original without throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

  • Foshizzle Monizzle?


How to Play Bebop - Volume 1

8/20/07

Bird Lives- the end all and be all site for Bird lovers

If you love Charlie Parker then you have to check out the Bird Lives web site.

This site from the UK is the most complete source of information about the great innovator. Along with all the biographical information there are interviews, including a Downbeat blindfold test, MP3s of live concerts and radio shows, galleries of photographs, streaming videos of TV shows, 53 downloadable transcriptions, links and much more.

The authors says of the site,"Ultimately, this site hopes to offer a concise and accurate account of Bird's life and work in order to correct much misinformation currently available in literature and on the internet."






Someone once said there are only two forms of Jazz; before Charlie Parker and after Charlie Parker.